Mercurial > repos > zzhou > spp_phantompeak
diff spp/man/get.conservative.fold.enrichment.profile.Rd @ 6:ce08b0efa3fd draft
Uploaded
author | zzhou |
---|---|
date | Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:11:40 -0500 |
parents | |
children |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/spp/man/get.conservative.fold.enrichment.profile.Rd Tue Nov 27 16:11:40 2012 -0500 @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +\name{get.conservative.fold.enrichment.profile} +\alias{get.conservative.fold.enrichment.profile} +%- Also NEED an '\alias' for EACH other topic documented here. +\title{ Estimate minimal fold enrichment/depletion along the chromosomes } +\description{ + The method provides a statistical assessment of enrichment/depletion + along the chromosomes. To assess tag density enrichment/depletion, a + sliding window of a specified size (\code{fws}) is used to calculate + the density of the foreground tags (\code{ftl}). Multiple, typically + larger windows are used to estimate background tag (\code{btl}) density around the + same location. The densities are compared as ratios of two Poisson + processes to estimate lower bound of foreground enrichment, or upper + bound of foreground depletion. If multiple window sizes were used to + estimate the background tag density, the most conservative one is + chosen for each point. +} +\usage{ +get.conservative.fold.enrichment.profile(ftl, btl, fws, bwsl = c(1, 5, 25, 50) * fws, step = 50, tag.shift = 146/2, alpha = 0.05, use.most.informative.scale = F, quick.calculation = T) +} +%- maybe also 'usage' for other objects documented here. +\arguments{ + \item{ftl}{ foreground tag vector list } + \item{btl}{ background tag vector list } + \item{fws}{ foreground window size } + \item{bwsl}{ background window scales. The size(s) of background windows + will be \code{fws*bwsl}. } + \item{step}{ spacing between positions at which the + enrichment/depletion is evaluated } + \item{tag.shift}{ number of basepairs by which positive and negative + tag coordinates should be shifted towards eachother (half of binding + peak separation distance)} + \item{alpha}{ desired level of statistical significance } + \item{use.most.informative.scale}{ for each position, instead of + evaluating enrichment ratio bounds for all background window scales, + choose the one with the highest observed density to speed up the calculations} + \item{quick.calculation}{ Use square root transformation method + instead of a Bayesian method. This speeds up the caclulation + considerably and is turned on by default. } + \item{background.density.scaling}{ If TRUE, regions of significant tag + enrichment will be masked out when calculating size ratio of the + signal to control datasets (to estimate ratio of the background tag + density). If FALSE, the dataset ratio will be equal to the ratio of + the number of tags in each dataset.} +} +\value{ + A list of elements corresponding to chromosomes, with each element + being an $x/$y data.frame giving the position and the log2 + conservative estimate of enrichment/depletion fold ratios around that + position. + Use \code{\link{writewig}} to output the structure to a WIG + file. +} +\references{ R.M.Price, D.G. Bonett "Estimating the ratio fo two Poisson + rates", Comp. Stat & Data Anal. 32(2000) 345} +\seealso{ \code{\link{get.smoothed.tag.density}} } +\examples{ + enrichment.estimates <- get.conservative.fold.enrichment.profile(chip.data,input.data,fws=2*binding.characteristics$whs,step=100,alpha=0.01); + writewig(enrichment.estimates,"example.enrichment.estimates.wig","Example conservative fold-enrichment/depletion estimates shown on log2 scale"); +}