diff lib/data/References.txt @ 0:4816e4a8ae95 draft default tip

Uploaded

--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/lib/data/References.txt	Wed Jan 20 09:23:18 2016 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+REFERENCES
+
+1. Wall, L.; Christiansen, T.; Schwartz, R.L. Programming Perl, 2nd edition. O'Reilly Media Inc., September 1996.
+
+2. CPAN: Comprehensive Perl archive network. [ URL: www.cpan.org ]
+
+3. FSF: Free software foundation. [ URL: www.fsf.org ]
+
+4. Knuth, D.E. The art of computer programming. Vol. 1-3. 2nd edition. Addison-Wesley, September 1998.
+
+5. Press, W.H.; Teukolsky, S.A.; Vetterling, W.T.; Flannery, B.P. Numerical recipies in C: the art of scientific computing. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, 1992.
+
+6. Orwant, J.; MacDonald, J.; Hietaniemi, J. Mastering algorithms with Perl. O'Reilly Media Inc., August 1999.
+
+7. Data for elements in the periodic table. [ URL: www.webelements.com ]
+
+8. Isotope data for elements in the periodic table. [ URL: http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Compositions/index.html ]
+
+9. Main data source for amino acids. [ URL: www.expasy.ch ]
+
+10. PerlMol - Perl modules for molecular chemistry. [ URL: www.perlmol.org ]
+
+11. OpenBabel: The open source chemistry toolbox. [ URL: http://openbabel.sourceforge.net/wiki/Main_Page ]
+
+12. CDK: The chemistry development kit. [ URL: http://cdk.sourceforge.net ]
+
+13. JOELIB. [ URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/joelib/ ]
+
+14. CTFile Formats. [ URL: http://accelrys.com/products/informatics/cheminformatics/ctfile-formats/no-fee.php ]
+
+15. Conway, D. Object oriented Perl. 1st edition. O'Reilly Media Inc., January 2000.
+
+16. Friedl, J.E.F. Mastering regular expressions. 3rd edition. O'Reilly Media Inc., August 2006.
+
+17. Schulz, G.E.; Schirmer, R.H. Principles of protein structure. Springer-Verlag, January 1997.
+
+18. Saenger, W. Principles of nucleic acid structure. Springer-Verlag, 1983.
+
+19. Cornish-Bowden, A. Nomenclature for incompletely specified bases in nucleic acid sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985, 13, 3021-3030.
+
+20. Clapham, C. A concise Oxford dictionary of mathematics. Oxford University Press, 1990.
+
+21. Cook, J.L. Conversion factors. Oxford University Press, 1993.
+
+22. Pauling, L. The nature of chemical bond. 3rd edition. Cornell University Press, June 1960.
+
+23. Daylight theory manual. [ URL: www.daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/theory/index.html ]
+
+24. Weininger, D. SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 28, 31-36.
+
+25. Weininger, D.; Weininger, A.; Weininger, J.L. SMILES. 2. Algorithm for generation of unique SMILES notation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 29, 97-101.
+
+26. Weininger, D. SMILES. 3. Depit. Graphical depiction of chemical structures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 30, 237-243.
+
+27. OEChem TK manual. [ URL: http://eyesopen.com/docs/toolkits/current/pdf/OEChem_TK-c++.pdf ]
+
+28. Parkin, G. Valence, oxidation number, and formal charge: Three related but fundamentally different concepts. J. Chem. Educ. 2006, 83, 791-799.
+
+29. Gateiger, J.; Jochum, C. An algorithm for the perception of synthetically important rigngs. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1979, 19, 43-47.
+
+30. Balducci, R.; Pearlman, R.S. Efficient exact solution of the ring perception problem. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 822-831.
+
+31. Hanser, T.; Jauffret, P.; Kaufmann, G. A new algorithm for exhaustive ring perception in a molecular graph. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 1146-1152.
+
+32. Cahn, R.S.; Ingold, C.; Prelog, V. Specification of molecular chirality. Angew. Chem. Internat. Edit. 1966, 5, 385-415.
+
+33. Prelog, V.; Helmchen, G. Basic principles of the CIP-system and proposals for revision. Angew. Chem. Internat. Edit. 1982, 21, 567-583.
+
+34. Mata, P.; Lobo, A.M.; Marshall, C.; Johnson, P.A. The CIP seqeunce rules: Analysis and proposal for a revision. Tetrahedron. 1993, 4, 657-668.
+
+35. Nourse, J.G.; Carhart, R.E.; Smith, D.H.; Djerassi, C. Exhaustive generation of stereoisomers for structure elucidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 1216-1223.
+
+36. Nourse, J.G.; Smith, D.H.; Carhart, R.E.; Djerassi, C. Computer-assisted elucidation of molecular structue with stereochemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 6289-6295.
+
+37. Fused ring systems. [ URL: www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/iupac/fusedring/ ]
+
+38. A hash function for hash table lookup. [ URL: www.burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/doobs.html ]
+
+39. Ralaivola, L.; Swamidass, S.J.; Saigo, H.; Baldi, P. Graph kernals for chemical informatics. Neural Networks. 2005, 18, 1093-1110.
+
+40. Willett. P.; Barnard, J.M.; Downs, G.M. Chemical Similarity Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 983-996.
+ 
+41. Holliday, J.D.; Hu, C-Y.; Willett, P. Grouping of coefficients for the calculation of inter-molecular similarity and dissimilarity using 2D fragment bit-strings, Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening. 2002, Vol. 5, No. 2, 155-166.
+
+42. Flinger, M.; Verducci, J.; Blower, P. A modification of the Jacard-Tanimoto similarity index for diverse selection of chemical compounds using binary strings. Technometrics. 2002, 44, 110-119.
+
+43. Wang, Y.; Bajorath, J. Balancing the influence of molecular complexity in fingerprint similarity searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2008, 48, 75-84.
+
+44. Flower, D.R. On the properties of bit string-based measures of chemical similarity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 379-386.
+
+45. The Enkfil.dat and Eksfil.dat files: The keys to understanding MDL keyset technology. [ URL: http://accelrys.com/products/pdf/keys-to-keyset-technology.pdf ]
+
+46. Durant, J.L.; Leland, B.A.; Henry, D.H.; Nourse, J.G. Reoptimization of MDL Keys for Use in Drug Discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1273-1280.
+
+47. Description of public MACCS keys. [ URL: https://list.indiana.edu/sympa/arc/chminf-l/2007-11/msg00058.html ]
+
+48. Morgan, H.L. The generation of a unique machine description for chemical structures - A technique developed at chemical abstracts service. J. Chem. Doc. 1965, 5, 107-112.
+
+49. Penny, R.H. A connectivity code for use in describing chemical structures. J. Chem. Doc. 1965, 5, 113-117. J. Chem. Doc. 1973, 3, 153-157.
+
+50. Adamson, G.W.; Cowell, J.; Lynch, M.F.; McLure, A.H.; Town, W.G. Yapp, M. Strategic considerations in design of a screening system for substructure searches of chemical structure files. 
+
+51. Wipke, W.T.; Krishnan, S.; Ouchi, G.I. Hash functions for rapid storage and retrieval of chemical structures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1273-1280. 1978, 18, 31- .
+
+52. Rogers, D.; Hahn, M. Extended-connectivity fingerprints. J. Chem. Inf. Mod. 2010, 50, 742-754.
+
+53. Faulon, J.-L.; Visco, D.P., Jr.; Pophale, R.S. The Signature Molecular Descriptor. 1. Using extended valence sequences in QSAR and QSPR studies. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 707-720.
+
+54. Faulon, J.-L.; Collins, M.J.; Carr, R.D. The signature molecular descriptor. 4. Canonizing molecules using extended valence sequences. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 427-436. 
+
+55. Bender, A.; Mussa, H.Y.; Glen, R.C.; Reiling, S. Molecular similarity searching using atom environments, information-based feature selection, and a naive bayesian classifier. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 170-178.
+
+56. Bender, A.; Mussa, H.Y.; Glen, R.C.; Reiling, S. Similarity searching of chemical databases using atom environment descriptors (MOLPRINT 2D): Evaluation of performance. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 1708-1718.
+
+57. Carhart, R.E.; Smith, D.H.; Venkataraghavan, R. Atom pairs as molecular features in structure-activity studies: Definition and application. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1985, 25, 64-73.
+
+58. Nilakantan, R.; Bauman, N.; Dixon, J.S.; Venkataraghavan, R. Topological torsion: A new molecular descriptor for SAR applications. Comparison with other descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1987, 27, 82-85.
+
+59. Langham, J.L.; Jain, A.N. Accurate and interpretable computational modeling of chemical mutagenicity.  J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2008, 48, 1833-1839. 
+
+60. Schneider, G.; Neidhart, W.; Giller, T.; Schmid, G. Scaffold-hopping by topological pharmacophore search: A contribution to virtual screening. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2894-2896.
+
+61. Fechner, U.; Franke, L.; Renner, S.; Schneider, P. Schneider, G. Comparison of correlation vector methods for ligand-based similarity searching. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2003, 17, 687-698.
+
+62. Fechner, U.; Schneider, G. Evaluation of distance metrics for ligand-based similarity searching. ChemBioChem. 2004, 5, 538-540.
+
+63. Downs, G.M.; Willett, P.; Fisanick, W. Similarity searching and clustering of chemical-structure databases using molecular property data.  J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1994, 34, 1094-1102.
+
+64. Chen, X.; Reynolds, C.H.; Performance of similarity measures in 2D fragment-based similarity searching: Comparison of structural descriptors and similarity coefficients. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1407-1414.
+
+65. Steffen, R.; Fechner, U.; Schneider, G. Alignment-free pharmacophore patterns: A correlation-vector approach. Pharmacophores and pharmacophore searches. 2006. Volume 32. Wiley-VCH. 49-80.
+
+66. McGregor, M.J.; Muskal, S. M. Pharmacophore fingerprinting. 1. Application to QSAR and focused library design.  J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 569-574.
+
+67. Floyd, R.W. Algorithm 97: Shortest path. Communications of the ACM. 1962, 5, 345.
+
+68. Horvath, D. Topological pharmacophores. Cheminformatics approaches to virtual screening. 2008. RSC Publishing. 44-75.
+
+69. Ewing, T.; Baber, C.; Feher, M. Novel 2D fingerprints in ligand-based virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 2423-2431.
+
+70. Watson, P. Naive Bayes classification using 2D pharmacophore feature triplet vectors. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48, 166-178
+
+71. Bonachera, F.; Parent, B.; Barbosa, F.; Froloff, N.; Horvath, D. Fuzzy tricentric pharmacophore fingerprints. 1. Topological fuzzy pharmacophore triplets and adapted molecular similarity scoring schemes. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2006, 46, 2457-2477.
+
+72. Kearsley, S.K.; Sallamack, S.; Fluder, E.M.; Andose, J.D.; Mosley, R.T.; Sheridan, R.P. Chemical Similarity Using Physiochemical Property Descriptors.J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1996, 36, 118-127. 
+
+73. Filimonov, D.; Poroikov, V.; Borodina, Y.; Gloriozova, T. Chemical similarity assessment through multilevel neighborhoods of atoms:  Definition and comparison with the other Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1999, 39, 666-670.
+
+74. RDKit - Cheminformatics and Machine Learning Software. [ URL: www.rdkit.org ]
+
+75. Kier, L.B.; Hall, L.H. Electrotopological state indices for atom types: A novel combination of electronic, topological, and valence state information. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995, 35, 1039-1045.
+
+76. Kier, L.B.; Hall, L.H. Molecular structure description - The electrotopological state. Academic Press, 1999.
+
+77. Molconn-Z - Program for generation of Molecular Connectivity, Shape, and Information Indices. [ URL: www.edusoft-lc.com/molconn/ ]
+
+78. Kier, L.B.; Hall, L.H. The E-State as the basis for molecular structure space definition and structure similarity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 784-791.
+
+79. SYBYL atom types. [ URL: http://www.tripos.com/tripos_resources/fileroot/pdfs/mol2_format2.pdf ]
+
+80. Clark, M.; Cramer III, R.D.; Opdenbosch, N.V. Validation of the general purpose Tripos 5.2 forcefield. J. Comput. Chem. 1989, 10, 982-1012. 
+
+81. Rappe, A.K.; Casewit, C.J.; Colwell, K.S.; Goddard III, W.A.; Skiff, W.M. UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10024-10035.
+
+82. Rappe, A. K. Personal communication. 2009.
+
+83. Halgren, T.A.; Merck Molecular Force Field. I. Basis, Form, Scope, Parameterization, and Performance of MMFF94. 1996, J. Comput. Chem., 17, 490-519.
+84. Halgren, T.A.; Merck molecular force field. II. MMFF94 van der Waals and electrostatic parameters for intermolecular interactions. J. Compt. Chem. 1996, 17, 520-552.
+
+85. Halgren, T.A.; Merck molecular force field. III. Molecular geometries and vibrational frequencies for MMFF94. J. Compt. Chem. 1996, 17,  553-586.
+
+86. Halgren, T.A.; Nachbar, R. B.; Merck molecular force field. IV. conformational energies and geometries for MMFF94. J. Compt. Chem. 1996, 17, 587-615.
+
+87. Halgren, T.A.; Merck molecular force field. V. Extension of MMFF94 using experimental data, additional computational data, and empirical rules. J. Compt. Chem. 1996, 17, 616-641.
+
+88. Mayo, S.L.; Olafson, B.A.; Goddard III, W.A. DREIDING: A Generic Force Field for Molecular Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 8897-8909.
+
+89. Wildman, S.A.; Crippen, G.M.; Prediction of Physicochemical Parameters by Atomic Contributions. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 868-873.
+
+90. Ertl, P.; Rohde, B.; Selzer, P. Fast calculation of molecular polar surface area as a sum of fragment-based contributions and its application to the prediction of drug transport Properties. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 3714-3717.
+
+91. Ertl, P. Personal communication. 2010.
+
+92. Veber, D.F.; Johnson, S. R.; Chend, H.Y.; Smith, B.R.; Ward, K.W.; Kopple, K.D. Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2165-2623.
+
+91. Lipinski, C.A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B.W.; Feeney, P.J. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug. Del. Rev. 1997, 23, 3-25.
+
+92. Congreve M.; Carr R., Murray C., Jhoti H.A. 'rule of three' for fragment-based lead discovery? Drug. Discov. Today. 2003, 8, 876-877.
+
+93. Zhao, Y.H.; Abraham, M.H.; Zissimos, A.M. Fast calculation of van der Waals volume as a sum of atomic and bond contributions and its application to drug compounds. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7368-7373.
+
+94. Chen, J.; Holliday, J.; Bradshaw, J.A machine learning approach to weighting schemes in the data fusion of similarity coefficients. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 185-194.
+
+95. Williams, C. Reverse fingerprinting, similarity searching by group fusion and fingerprint bit importance. Molecular Diversity. 2006, 10, 311-332.
+
+96. Whittle, M.; Gillet, V.J.; Willett, P.; Loesel, J. Analysis of data fusion methods in virtual screening: Similarity and group Fusion. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 2206-2219.
+
+97. Hert, J.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D.J.; Acklin, P.; Azzaoui, K.; Jacoby, E.; Schuffenhauer, A. New methods for ligand-based virtual screening: Use of data fusion and machine learning to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 462-470.
+
+98. Chu, C-W.; Holliday, J.D.; Willett, P. Effect of data standardization on chemical clustering and similarity searching. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2009, 49, 155-161.
+
+99. Arif, S.M.; Holliday, J.D.; Willett, P. Inverse frequency weighting of fragments for similarity-based virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2010, 50, 1340-1349.
+
+100. Chen, B.; Mueller, C.; Willett, P. Combinations rules for group fusion in similarity-based virtual screening. Mol. Inf. 2010, 29, 533-541.
+
+101. Willett, P.; Similarity searching using 2D structural fingerprints. Chemoinformatics and Computational Chemical Biology. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2011, 672, 133-58.
+
+102. Berglund, A.E.; Head, R.D. PZIM: A method for similarity searching using atom environments and 2d alignment. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 1790-1795.
+
+103. Baldi, P.; Nasr, R. When is chemical similarity significant? The statistical distribution of chemical similarity scores and its extreme values. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 1205-1222.
+
+104. Godden, J.W.; Stahura, F.L,; Bajorath, J. Anatomy of fingerprint search calculations on structurally diverse sets of active compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 1812-1819.
+
+105. Geppert, H.; Horvath, T.; Gartner, T.; Wrobel, S.; Bajorath, J. Support-vector-machine-based ranking significantly improves the effectiveness of similarity searching using 2d fingerprints and multiple reference compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48, 742-746.
+
+106. Wang, Y.; Geppert, H.; Bajorath, J. Shannon entropy-based fingerprint similarity search strategy. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2009, 49, 1687-1691.
+
+107. Nisius, B.; Bajorath, J. Molecular fingerprint recombination: Generating hybrid fingerprints for similarity searching from different fingerprint types. ChemMedChem. 2009, 4, 1859-1863.
+
+108. Vogt, M.; Bajorath, J. Predicting the Performance of Fingerprint Similarity Searching. Chemoinformatics and Computational Chemical Biology. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2011, 672, 159-173.
+
+109. Muchmore, S.W.; Debe, D.A.; Metz, J.T.; Brown, S.P.; Martin, Y. .; Hajduk, P. H. Application of belief theory to similarity data fusion for use in analog searching and lead hopping. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48, 941-948.
+
+110. Bender, A.; Jenkins, J.L.; Scheiber, J.; Sukuru, S.C.K.; Glick, M.; Davies, J. W. How similar are similarity searching methods? A principal component analysis of molecular descriptor space. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 108-119.
+
+111. Sastry, M.; Lowrie, J.F.; Dixon, S.L.; Sherman, W. Large-scale sstematic analysis of 2D fingerprint methods and parameters to improve virtual screening enrichments. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 771-784.
+
+112. Tiikkainen, P.; Markt, P.; Wolber, G.; Kirchmair, J.; Distinto, S.; Poso, A.; Kallioniemi. O. Critical comparison of virtual screening methods against the MUV data set. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2009, 49, 2168-2178.
+
+113. Venkatraman, V.; Prez-Nueno, V. I.; Mavridis L.; Ritchie, D.W. Comprehensive comparison of ligand-based virtual screening tools against the DUD data set reveals limitations of current 3D methods. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2010, 50,  2079-2093.
+
+114. Chemfp - Cheminformatics fingerprints file formats and tools. [ URL: http://code.google.com/p/chem-fingerprints/ ]
+ 
+115. Yan, A.; Gasteiger, J.; Prediction of aqueous solubility of organic compounds by topological descriptors. QSAR Comb Sci. 2003, 22, 821-829.
+
+116. Lovering, F.; Bikker, J.; Humblet, C. Escape from flatland: Increasing saturation as an approach to improving clinical success. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 6752-6756.
+
+117. Hann, M.M.; Leach, A.R.; Harper, G. Molecular complexity and its impact on the probability of finding leads for drug discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 856-864.
+
+118. Schuffenhauer, S.; Brown, N.; Selzer, P.; Ertl, P.; Jacoby, E. Relationships between molecular complexity, biological activity, and structural diversity. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2006, 46, 525-535.
+
+119. Walters, W.P.; Green, J.; Weiss, J.R.; Murcko, M. A. What do medicinal chemists actually make? A 50-year retrospective. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 6405-6416.
+
+120. Park, S.K.; Miller, K.W. Random number generators: Good ones are hard to find. Communications of the ACM. 1998, 10, 1192- 1200.
+
+121. Huang R.; Southall N.; Wang Y.; Yasgar A.; Shinn P.; Jadhav A.; Nguyen D. T.; Austin C. P. The NCGC pharmaceutical collection: A comprehensive resource of clinically approved drugs enabling repurposing and chemical genomics. Sci. Transl. Med. 2011, 80ps16. 
+
+122. Berman,  H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Research. 2000, 28, 235-242.
+
+123. Jmol: An open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. [ URL: http://www.jmol.org/ ]
+
+124. Lloyd, D. What is aromaticity? J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 442-447.
+
+125. Sayle, R. Cheminformatics toolkits: A personal perspective. [ URL: http://www.rdkit.org/UGM/2012/Sayle_RDKitPerspective.pdf ]
+
+126. Dominus, M. J. Higher-order Perl. [ URL: http://hop.perl.plover.com/ ]
+
+127. OpenSMILES. [ URL: http://www.opensmiles.org/opensmiles.pdf ]
+
+128. Tim Vandermeersch. OpenSMARTS. [ URL: http://www.moldb.net/opensmarts/ ]
+