Mercurial > repos > cpt_testbed > functionalworkflow
comparison test-data/LipoToGFF_In.txt @ 0:f678e282b320 draft default tip
"planemo upload"
| author | cpt_testbed |
|---|---|
| date | Fri, 06 May 2022 07:07:23 +0000 |
| parents | |
| children |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
| -1:000000000000 | 0:f678e282b320 |
|---|---|
| 1 # ORF.0.472_0.8077298255.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 2 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 3 ORF.0.472_0.8077298255.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 4 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 5 # ORF.0.465_0.466377183402.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 6 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 7 ORF.0.465_0.466377183402.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 8 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 9 # ORF.0.466_0.685859290271.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 10 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 11 ORF.0.466_0.685859290271.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 12 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 13 # ORF.0.468_0.803001272192.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 14 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 15 ORF.0.468_0.803001272192.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 16 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 17 # ORF.0.708_0.889453606077.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 18 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 19 ORF.0.708_0.889453606077.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 20 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 21 # ORF.0.458_0.61399204562.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 22 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 23 ORF.0.458_0.61399204562.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 24 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 25 # ORF.0.459_0.323250347541.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 26 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 27 ORF.0.459_0.323250347541.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 28 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 29 # ORF.0.460_0.509039455004.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 30 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 31 ORF.0.460_0.509039455004.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 32 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 33 # ORF.0.461_0.392081904542.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 34 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 35 ORF.0.461_0.392081904542.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 36 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 37 # ORF.0.699_0.764949625216.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 38 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 39 ORF.0.699_0.764949625216.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 40 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 41 # ORF.0.703_0.981371874022.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 42 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 43 ORF.0.703_0.981371874022.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 44 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 45 # ORF.0.705_0.438813830323.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 46 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 47 ORF.0.705_0.438813830323.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 48 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 49 # ORF.0.622_0.865794102081.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 50 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 51 ORF.0.622_0.865794102081.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 52 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 53 # ORF.0.623_0.846988205141.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 54 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 55 ORF.0.623_0.846988205141.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 56 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 57 # ORF.0.625_0.0578111846669.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 58 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 59 ORF.0.625_0.0578111846669.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 60 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 61 # ORF.0.626_0.303786861772.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 62 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 63 ORF.0.626_0.303786861772.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 64 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 65 # ORF.0.630_0.467112600707.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 66 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 67 ORF.0.630_0.467112600707.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 68 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 69 # ORF.0.631_0.2883116125.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 70 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 71 ORF.0.631_0.2883116125.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 72 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 73 # ORF.0.636_0.876600016398.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 74 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 75 ORF.0.636_0.876600016398.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 76 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 77 # ORF.0.640_0.0888066128056.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 78 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 79 ORF.0.640_0.0888066128056.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 80 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 81 # ORF.0.655_0.212962186525.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 82 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 83 ORF.0.655_0.212962186525.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 84 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 85 # ORF.0.659_0.370352364369.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 86 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 87 ORF.0.659_0.370352364369.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 88 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 89 # ORF.0.660_0.561664408596.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 90 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 91 ORF.0.660_0.561664408596.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 92 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 93 # ORF.0.662_0.547739243117.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 94 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 95 ORF.0.662_0.547739243117.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 96 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 97 # ORF.0.667_0.381504311163.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 98 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 99 ORF.0.667_0.381504311163.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 100 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 101 # ORF.0.457_0.112605087319.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 102 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 103 ORF.0.457_0.112605087319.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 104 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 105 # ORF.0.518_0.704496503167.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 106 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 107 ORF.0.518_0.704496503167.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 108 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 109 # ORF.0.531_0.284124356131.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 110 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 111 ORF.0.531_0.284124356131.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 112 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 113 # ORF.0.534_0.230486359187.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 114 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 115 ORF.0.534_0.230486359187.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 116 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 117 # ORF.0.549_0.435747482069.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 118 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 119 ORF.0.549_0.435747482069.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 120 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 121 # ORF.0.603_0.488926379773.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 122 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 123 ORF.0.603_0.488926379773.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 124 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 125 # ORF.0.605_0.950422684088.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 126 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 127 ORF.0.605_0.950422684088.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 128 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 129 # ORF.0.606_0.329949811104.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 130 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 131 ORF.0.606_0.329949811104.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 132 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 133 # ORF.0.611_0.815705221168.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 134 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 135 ORF.0.611_0.815705221168.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 136 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 137 # ORF.0.613_0.104890641676.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 138 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 139 ORF.0.613_0.104890641676.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 140 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 141 # ORF.0.17_0.711047642618.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 142 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 143 ORF.0.17_0.711047642618.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 144 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 145 # ORF.0.139_0.904626958426.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 146 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 147 ORF.0.139_0.904626958426.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 148 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 149 # ORF.0.445_0.286571403109.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 150 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 151 ORF.0.445_0.286571403109.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 152 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 153 # ORF.0.345_0.971616620883.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 154 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 155 ORF.0.345_0.971616620883.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 156 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 157 # ORF.0.347_0.0208968983552.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 158 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 159 ORF.0.347_0.0208968983552.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 160 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 161 # ORF.0.517_0.929120702544.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 162 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 163 ORF.0.517_0.929120702544.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 164 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 165 # ORF.0.146_0.351389104617.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 166 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 167 ORF.0.146_0.351389104617.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 168 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 169 # ORF.0.439_0.445866101899.CDS TMH score=6.51858 margin=6.713639 | |
| 170 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 171 ORF.0.439_0.445866101899.CDS LipoP1.0:Best TMH 1 1 6.51858 | |
| 172 ORF.0.439_0.445866101899.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin TMH 1 1 6.713639 | |
| 173 ORF.0.439_0.445866101899.CDS LipoP1.0:Class SpI 1 1 -0.195059 | |
| 174 ORF.0.439_0.445866101899.CDS LipoP1.0:Class CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 175 ORF.0.439_0.445866101899.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 20 21 -0.295218 # SPGVP|CIMLL | |
| 176 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 177 # ORF.0.440_0.915263915342.CDS TMH score=0.241158 margin=0.442071 | |
| 178 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 179 ORF.0.440_0.915263915342.CDS LipoP1.0:Best TMH 1 1 0.241158 | |
| 180 ORF.0.440_0.915263915342.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin TMH 1 1 0.442071 | |
| 181 ORF.0.440_0.915263915342.CDS LipoP1.0:Class CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 182 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 183 # ORF.0.183_0.0663532791257.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 184 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 185 ORF.0.183_0.0663532791257.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 186 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 187 # ORF.0.185_0.343675913625.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 188 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 189 ORF.0.185_0.343675913625.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 190 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 191 # ORF.0.580_0.42130451371.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 192 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 193 ORF.0.580_0.42130451371.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 194 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 195 # ORF.0.429_0.211525337226.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 margin=0.370359 | |
| 196 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 197 ORF.0.429_0.211525337226.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 198 ORF.0.429_0.211525337226.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin CYT 1 1 0.370359 | |
| 199 ORF.0.429_0.211525337226.CDS LipoP1.0:Class TMH 1 1 -0.571272 | |
| 200 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 201 # ORF.0.202_0.502577350308.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 202 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 203 ORF.0.202_0.502577350308.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 204 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 205 # ORF.0.217_0.854168148494.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 margin=1.810677 | |
| 206 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 207 ORF.0.217_0.854168148494.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 208 ORF.0.217_0.854168148494.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin CYT 1 1 1.810677 | |
| 209 ORF.0.217_0.854168148494.CDS LipoP1.0:Class SpI 1 1 -2.01159 | |
| 210 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 211 # ORF.0.224_0.295192659405.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 212 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 213 ORF.0.224_0.295192659405.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 214 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 215 # ORF.0.355_0.773691408662.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 216 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 217 ORF.0.355_0.773691408662.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 218 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 219 # ORF.0.571_0.245647554641.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 220 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 221 ORF.0.571_0.245647554641.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 222 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 223 # ORF.0.492_0.914947831416.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 margin=0.188252 | |
| 224 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 225 ORF.0.492_0.914947831416.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 226 ORF.0.492_0.914947831416.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin CYT 1 1 0.188252 | |
| 227 ORF.0.492_0.914947831416.CDS LipoP1.0:Class TMH 1 1 -0.389165 | |
| 228 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 229 # ORF.0.494_0.190486747638.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 230 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 231 ORF.0.494_0.190486747638.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 232 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 233 # ORF.0.33_0.821816667683.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 margin=1.151907 | |
| 234 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 235 ORF.0.33_0.821816667683.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 236 ORF.0.33_0.821816667683.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin CYT 1 1 1.151907 | |
| 237 ORF.0.33_0.821816667683.CDS LipoP1.0:Class TMH 1 1 -1.35282 | |
| 238 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 239 # ORF.0.34_0.707053863467.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 240 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 241 ORF.0.34_0.707053863467.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 242 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 243 # ORF.0.231_0.000923123852602.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 244 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 245 ORF.0.231_0.000923123852602.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 246 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 247 # ORF.0.233_0.405974692709.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 248 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 249 ORF.0.233_0.405974692709.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 250 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 251 # ORF.0.237_0.755472071473.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 252 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 253 ORF.0.237_0.755472071473.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 254 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 255 # ORF.0.238_0.914046339376.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 256 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 257 ORF.0.238_0.914046339376.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 258 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 259 # ORF.0.365_0.2945108684.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 260 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 261 ORF.0.365_0.2945108684.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 262 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 263 # ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS SpII score=5.92551 margin=3.72509 cleavage=17-18 Pos+2=L | |
| 264 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 265 ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS LipoP1.0:Best SpII 1 1 5.92551 | |
| 266 ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin SpII 1 1 3.72509 | |
| 267 ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS LipoP1.0:Class SpI 1 1 2.20042 | |
| 268 ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS LipoP1.0:Class CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 269 ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavII 17 18 5.9255 # ICIIV|CLSWA Pos+2=L | |
| 270 ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 22 23 2.16267 # CLSWA|VNHYR | |
| 271 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 272 # ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS SpII score=19.8902 margin=11.77152 cleavage=19-20 Pos+2=T | |
| 273 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 274 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Best SpII 1 1 19.8902 | |
| 275 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin SpII 1 1 11.77152 | |
| 276 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Class SpI 1 1 8.11868 | |
| 277 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Class CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 278 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Class TMH 1 1 -1.32568 | |
| 279 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavII 19 20 19.8902 # LVVVG|CTSKQ Pos+2=T | |
| 280 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 25 26 6.80431 # TSKQS|VSQCV | |
| 281 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 19 20 6.49651 # LVVVG|CTSKQ | |
| 282 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 22 23 5.34572 # VGCTS|KQSVS | |
| 283 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 23 24 3.96804 # GCTSK|QSVSQ | |
| 284 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 26 27 2.72646 # SKQSV|SQCVK | |
| 285 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 27 28 2.57107 # KQSVS|QCVKP | |
| 286 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 24 25 1.65562 # CTSKQ|SVSQC | |
| 287 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 17 18 1.37856 # LPLVV|VGCTS | |
| 288 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 21 22 -0.782641 # VVGCT|SKQSV | |
| 289 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 28 29 -1.09651 # QSVSQ|CVKPP | |
| 290 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 20 21 -2.99138 # VVVGC|TSKQS | |
| 291 # ORF.0.65_0.403948729686.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 292 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 293 ORF.0.65_0.403948729686.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 294 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 295 # ORF.0.380_0.771335496557.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 margin=1.869487 | |
| 296 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 297 ORF.0.380_0.771335496557.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 298 ORF.0.380_0.771335496557.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin CYT 1 1 1.869487 | |
| 299 ORF.0.380_0.771335496557.CDS LipoP1.0:Class TMH 1 1 -2.0704 | |
| 300 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 301 # ORF.0.391_0.169373954797.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 302 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 303 ORF.0.391_0.169373954797.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 304 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 305 # ORF.0.400_0.811321232506.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 306 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 307 ORF.0.400_0.811321232506.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 308 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 309 # ORF.0.260_0.577298671452.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 310 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 311 ORF.0.260_0.577298671452.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 312 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 313 # ORF.0.261_0.357298653378.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 314 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 315 ORF.0.261_0.357298653378.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 316 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 317 # ORF.0.268_0.501011908227.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 318 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 319 ORF.0.268_0.501011908227.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 320 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 321 # ORF.0.269_0.219984821414.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 322 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 323 ORF.0.269_0.219984821414.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 324 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 325 # ORF.0.278_0.44001518346.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 326 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 327 ORF.0.278_0.44001518346.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 328 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 329 # ORF.0.81_0.839099082128.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 330 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 331 ORF.0.81_0.839099082128.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 332 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
| 333 # ORF.0.87_0.518549362319.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
| 334 # Cut-off=-3 | |
| 335 ORF.0.87_0.518549362319.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
| 336 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted |
